“Good”. “Talent”. These words were up for discussion at Nathan Bransford’s blog today.
Nathan gets reams of comments on every post, and I told myself in no uncertain terms — stop reading the comments! You don’t have time. You’re supposed to be WRITING A NOVEL. But what a lovely avoidance technique, just a comment or two. It’s like eating those evil Halloween treats — candy corn — just one, just one more, just two, soon I have an upset stomach, or in the case of blog comments, soon I’ve run out of time to write.
Today, reading all the comments was time well-spent. It was interesting to notice various definitions of “good” and “talent”, but those definitions aside, here are two excerpts that made my day, my week, possibly my year:
One commenter quoted Faulkner responding to a question on the elusive concept of “talent”. I only captured the bit that struck me: The most important thing is insight, that is to be–curiosity–to wonder, to mull, and to muse why it is that man does what he does, and if you have that, then I don’t think the talent makes much difference, whether you’ve got it or not. Isn’t that what drives us all to write? Isn’t that where stories bubble up and get their death grip on us, from that wondering: why?
The second comment that thrilled me is from Lydia Sharp of The Sharp Angle: I feel every writer has an audience out there somewhere, they just have to find it.
Doesn’t that keep you going? It does me.